Template talk:Mob: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* If you're wondering why a million updates, I wasn't satisfied with all of the deadspace showing up, I think I've squashed it. I still argue that you don't need a separate section for descriptions since everything should have a description at the top by default. At least with templates that is a discussion that can be had any day. [[User:Skace|Skace]] 16:49, 3 July 2008 (UTC) | * If you're wondering why a million updates, I wasn't satisfied with all of the deadspace showing up, I think I've squashed it. I still argue that you don't need a separate section for descriptions since everything should have a description at the top by default. At least with templates that is a discussion that can be had any day. [[User:Skace|Skace]] 16:49, 3 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
** I was trying to do the same earlier, but I didn't have any luck (I couldn't see any whitespace in the template while there was in the generated page). About the section, it just looks un-rodpedia-y to me, and I would prefer it if we could have it in a separate section, since then it is clear that that's what the '''builder''' wrote (rather than the page editor). But yes, with templates, it's a trivial change (<3). --[[User:Poromenos|Poromenos]] 20:45, 3 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
< | |||
| | |||
Latest revision as of 17:40, 7 July 2008
- If you're wondering why a million updates, I wasn't satisfied with all of the deadspace showing up, I think I've squashed it. I still argue that you don't need a separate section for descriptions since everything should have a description at the top by default. At least with templates that is a discussion that can be had any day. Skace 16:49, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
- I was trying to do the same earlier, but I didn't have any luck (I couldn't see any whitespace in the template while there was in the generated page). About the section, it just looks un-rodpedia-y to me, and I would prefer it if we could have it in a separate section, since then it is clear that that's what the builder wrote (rather than the page editor). But yes, with templates, it's a trivial change (<3). --Poromenos 20:45, 3 July 2008 (UTC)