User talk:Skace: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 20:44, 3 September 2008

I saw the sandbox, it's very impressive. I'm quite partial to style #2, I think we should just use CSS to do anything we want in the template, something like provide "idname", "iddetails" and "idaffects" parts for the ID and styling them in a custom manner however we want. I also like the description stuff, but I'm undecided on the particular style yet. --Poromenos 18:34, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks... I can't seem to get CSS class objects going IE User:Skace/Common.css..Not quite sure what I need to do yet. --Skace 20:44, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:38, 30 May 2008 view source Poromenos (talk \| contribs) realuser, trusted, verified 1,816 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 20:44, 3 September 2008 view source Skace (talk \| contribs) trusted 826 edits No edit summary
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	* ~~Dude~~, '''~~please''' conform to~~ the ~~templates when adding new pages~~ :( ~~We now have 50 new pages that look different from every other page on RoDpedia~~ :( --[[User:~~Poromenos~~\|~~Poromenos~~]] 20:38, ~~29 May~~ 2008 (~~CDT~~)		* I saw the sandbox, it's very impressive. I'm quite partial to style #2, I think we should just use CSS to do anything we want in the template, something like provide "idname", "iddetails" and "idaffects" parts for the ID and styling them in a custom manner however we want. I also like the description stuff, but I'm undecided on the particular style yet. --[[User:Poromenos\|Poromenos]] 18:34, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
			** Thanks... I can't seem to get CSS class objects going IE [[User:Skace/Common.css]]..Not quite sure what I need to do yet. --[[User:Skace\|Skace]] 20:44, 3 September 2008 (UTC)