|
|
| (7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| Currently the [[Special:Categories|categories]] are listed like so:
| | * I feel that I should mention that the templates "!" and "!-" should be useless now. For some reason, the Iteminfo template wouldn't recognize it... --[[User:Trinexx|Trinexx]] 00:26, 5 November 2006 (EST) |
| | |
| |_ Items Classes _|
| |
| |_ Light Mage_|
| |
| |_ The Unholy Symbol of the Damned _|
| |
| | |
| When skills are added, each skill should be under its corresponding class and under the Skills category. This presents a problem, because the skills category must also be further split into subcategories by class.
| |
| | |
| What do we do? Do we add all skills under the class category and the skills category? Then we would have a huge list of skills and equipment under the Mage category and a jumbled mess of skills from all classes under the Skills category.
| |
| | |
| Do we create separate categories, i.e. "Mage items" and "Mage skills"? Then each skill would be under its own class category and each item would be under its own category as well. Perhaps also the "Mage" category would have the "Mage items" and "Mage skills" subcategories. This would have a lot f Category tags in each item. A way for each category to display all its subitems would be nice. Until I find one, please post here alternate ideas on categories. Personally, I vote for this, the separation of items and skills. Also, I don't think skills and items should be added under the "Mage" category, although "Mage" will have "Mage skills" and "Mage equipment" as subcategories. [[User:Poromenos|Poromenos]] 19:21, 12 September 2005 (CDT)
| |
| | |
| This is a rough draft of my proposition, and I think this is what makes most sense (legend: C = Category, P = Page, categories that don't have an Item/Skill in them only point to subcategories):
| |
| | |
| [[Image:Categorization.png|600px]]
| |