Talk:Bilwen: Difference between revisions

From RoDpedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Tokai (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Tokai (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
* Eurion and Bilwen should probably be a subset of the [[Azure Sea]] area. Although they're kind of independent of the rest of the area, they're not true areas of their own so probably don't deserve their own articles. Not too sure how to format it though.
* Eurion and Bilwen should probably be a subset of the [[Azure Sea]] area. Although they're kind of independent of the rest of the area, they're not true areas of their own so probably don't deserve their own articles. Not too sure how to format it though. -[[User:Tokai|Tokai]] 12:01, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
** Well I have no desire to actually map the [[Azure Sea]]. I'm more curious about the puzzle between the islands. (Pollo)
*** Yeah, me neither. Well, I've done a large chunk, but it ain't pretty. The point stands, though. Anal-retentive categorizers are anal-retentive categorizers are me. -[[User:Tokai|Tokai]] 10:46, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 10:46, 6 August 2007

  • Eurion and Bilwen should probably be a subset of the Azure Sea area. Although they're kind of independent of the rest of the area, they're not true areas of their own so probably don't deserve their own articles. Not too sure how to format it though. -Tokai 12:01, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
    • Well I have no desire to actually map the Azure Sea. I'm more curious about the puzzle between the islands. (Pollo)
      • Yeah, me neither. Well, I've done a large chunk, but it ain't pretty. The point stands, though. Anal-retentive categorizers are anal-retentive categorizers are me. -Tokai 10:46, 6 August 2007 (UTC)