Template talk:Item: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* There is already a template in place, and frankly I like how the older stuff looks more. [[User:Pollo|Pollo]] 8/27/08 | * There is already a template in place, and frankly I like how the older stuff looks more. [[User:Pollo|Pollo]] 8/27/08 | ||
* The old way is very inflexible, new information should really be added using the new templates, which can be customized later without having to go back to each article (although I think we should try to make the new templates look like the old ones, at least for items, with its monospaced IDs). --[[User:Poromenos|Poromenos]] 22:34, 27 August 2008 (UTC) | * The old way is very inflexible, new information should really be added using the new templates, which can be customized later without having to go back to each article (although I think we should try to make the new templates look like the old ones, at least for items, with its monospaced IDs). --[[User:Poromenos|Poromenos]] 22:34, 27 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
* Wish you had talked to me about this. There is a million better ways of doing fixed spacing than the giant gray box. And even if the giant box was preferable, we could have done it without changing the item ID numbering schemes. You've made the template less flexible in the process and forced updating many items when the change could have been done with a simple <nowiki><pre></pre></nowiki> tags! This would have taken 10 minutes! [[User:Skace|Skace]] 09:57, 28 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:57, 28 August 2008
- First run at a possible item template. I have absolutely no idea how to handle the categories.... Skace 15:14, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- There is already a template in place, and frankly I like how the older stuff looks more. Pollo 8/27/08
- The old way is very inflexible, new information should really be added using the new templates, which can be customized later without having to go back to each article (although I think we should try to make the new templates look like the old ones, at least for items, with its monospaced IDs). --Poromenos 22:34, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
- Wish you had talked to me about this. There is a million better ways of doing fixed spacing than the giant gray box. And even if the giant box was preferable, we could have done it without changing the item ID numbering schemes. You've made the template less flexible in the process and forced updating many items when the change could have been done with a simple <pre></pre> tags! This would have taken 10 minutes! Skace 09:57, 28 August 2008 (UTC)